Hmmm, it seems apologies are in order...

Sorry, I must have been mistaken.

quote:

Originally posted by Frank Abela:
Hmmm, it seems apologies are in order...

Sorry, I must have been mistaken.

Frank, no need for the apol's.

23.976 frame/sec NTSC film is used with MPEG1 video (used mainly with VCD). MPEG2 (DVD video) specifies NTSC as 29.97 frame/sec

VCD is a NASTY combination of PAL and NTSC, and this is why in PAL everything looks vertically stretched, whilst in NTSC everything looks vertically squashed. A trully loathsome format.

PAL films have their pitch up 4% precisely because of the 24fps film->25fps PAL conversion.

NTSC 3:2 pulldown looks horrible - nice slow pan judders. Goes really nicely with my nystagmus. Yuk.

At least we're (in the main) past the bad old days of PAL laserdiscs being standards-converted from NTSC; my UK version of "Point break" looks bloody awful. Correct audio pitch, faded video with blurring and all-round fuzziness. A worn taped-off-of-telly version looks better.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by domfjbrown:
VCD is a NASTY combination of PAL and NTSC, and this is why in PAL everything looks vertically stretched, whilst in NTSC everything looks vertically squashed. A trully loathsome format.

here here.....

quote:

Originally posted by arf005:
Does anybody else own any superbit flicks and know what I'm on about.......

Panic Room.

Film plods along for sure, but it's very well done considering it's almost entirely set inside a house.

The camera movements are quite inventive and the general darkness in the film allows the encoding to show very good shadow detail.

I quite liked Panic Room, and didn't realize it was out there on superbit....
....to be honest I can't remember if we own it, think we do, in which case I probably wouldn't buy it again.....there's only been one version worth that so far which was Crouching Tiger, but a superbit 5th Element would be tempting!!

Cheers,
Ali

quote:

Originally posted by iDunno:

Panic Room.

Film plods along for sure, but it's very well done considering it's almost entirely set inside a house.

The camera movements are quite inventive and the general darkness in the film allows the encoding to show very good shadow detail.

Panic Room has a subtle amount of (reasonably well done) CG in it. The obvious is the camera tracking up through the centre of the stairs through each floor... some shots of the kitchen...the flashlight in the air- space also is composited CG....

IMHO, on Supabit it is more noticable than with the original commercial version.

But still a good film

quote:

Originally posted by AV@naim:
Panic Room has a subtle amount of (reasonably well done) CG in it. The obvious is the camera tracking up through the centre of the stairs through each floor... some shots of the kitchen...the flashlight in the air- space also is composited CG....

IMHO, on Supabit it is more noticable than with the original commercial version.

But still a good film

I remember watching the "making of" where they had various rails around the house on which the cameras were actually mounted and allowed them to move through the floorboards and such, including through the gap between the stairs. All very clever stuff, though on the copy I have it almost looks too "clean"!

Dunno about the flashlight thingy.

Anybody seen Flight Plan? I got through about 10 minutes of it and was dozing off... Jodie Foster must have a thing with plodding scripts and confined spaces

http://www.mentalimages.com/4_1_motion_pictures/index.html

scroll down to "Panic Room" section and click on the thumbs to view em larger.

quote:

Originally posted by AV@naim:
http://www.mentalimages.com/4_1_motion_pictures/index.html

scroll down to "Panic Room" section and click on the thumbs to view em larger.

For a moment there you had me scratching my head! I wasn't imagining things, the plot thickens:

http://www.aec.at/en/archives/prix_archive/prix_projekt.asp?iProjectID=11705

http://actionadventure.about.com/library/weekly/2002/aa032902a.htm

Guess they missed the post-prod stuff out of the making (maybe they were still doing it!), thanks for pointing it out. Looks like they combined various bits of live and CG, although I'm surprised that with something as simple as a passageway shot that they would 3D it instead of reshooting.

yes, there is quite a bit in that film.

This is the problem with high bitrate DVD's. As the bitrate goes up, the CG becomes more obvious (although CG is coming on in leaps and bounds). On standard bitrate DVD's the "noise" that MPEG2 encoding produces seems to hide alot of the CG quirks.

Having a vaguely CG backround, you get to notice what looks correct and what doesn't.