![]() | Visit the Naim E-Store |
Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
|
Administrator |
Seems to have picked up nicely.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Adam Meredith, |
||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
How disappointing there was no postcard from Mrs Trellis of North Wales. |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
An unforgivable oversight. Does that mean we need to re-run the game? |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
Almost certainly. But it's very bad form to play the same variation twice running even in such circumstances. If someone else wants to pick one.... |
|||
|
|
Member |
Moved Reply:
Having consulted the rules (obviously only the shortened version as seen at - http://www.isihac.co.uk/games/mcvariations/index.html) I would strongly suggest MORTIMER’s 2nd AMENDMENT This is a highly specialised version of the game, which once Parsons Green has been declared forces play along the Great Western axis, obliging players to sacrifice Seven Sisters in order to prise open their opponent’s laterals. If anyone is in agreemnet, then I would suggest an opening gambit of: Wood Green |
|||
|
|
Member |
Moved Reply:
Osterley - but only just, I feel daring this morning (or just foolhardy) |
|||
|
|
Member |
Moved Reply:
Shadwell. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Moved Reply:
Is Gruntfuttock's Posture in force ? |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
Important Announcement - actually a station announcement. At Tate Britain in the exhibition entitled "Modern Painters - The Camden Town Group" there are references to the this great transportation hub in at least two images - a postcard showing the station in it's early days and at least one painting shoing the station when it was alongside a park. Now back to the important matter in hand. |
|||
|
|
Administrator |
Moved Reply:
Enormously funny - please do not disturb the players. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Moved Reply:
Temple. |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
Vauxhall Cross |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Two threads, now that's just confusing. What's more Adam, this is the second time you've split a thread I've started - I'm going to start taking it personally soon!
Ah well. Ladbroke Grove. Cunning, that boxes everyone in somewhat. Gray's Inn Road. |
|||
|
|
Administrator |
Moved Reply:
"*" |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
Does she spit, swallow or gargle? Jono |
|||
|
|
Member |
Moved Reply:
A real MC expert would know the importance of this question... "Gruntfuttock's Posture" , in which the moves of the game are retrospectively altered in order to favour one player or another - also known as "editing the broadcast tape" ...which as moderator you could do Adam..fancy throwing away a chance to fiddle the result. Humph would be most disappointed. |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
I must confess, it's been a while since I've played Mortimer's 2nd (it rather went out of fashion following the debacle at the 1990 world championships). So you'll have to forgive me if I'm a little rusty. Aldgate. |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
Angel Just to derail procedings. Jono |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
It is a shame, but Wood Lane. |
|||
|
|
Senior Member |
Moved Reply:
Ah, now, an interesting move. Is that Wood Lane circa 1908 (now closed) or the new Wood Lane due to open in late 2008 to serve the new shopping centre in White City? Either way this seems to be a contentious deployment of the Wellsian clause and would I be right in saying inadmissable whilst playing under Mortimer's 2nd Amendment unless prior agreement is obtained from the other participants (albeit nicely played along the Great Western Axis)? In view of this I move that 555 is forced to reconsider this ploy and play an outlying branch line station (check before you travel), say Chesham, by way of forfeit. In which case I now put forward Paddington. |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed
