Senior Member
|
Use it on both, but when you're at it, why not try one at a time and revel at the result when used on both  Regards Rickard P.S I assume that you've got the NAPSC D.S
|
| |
| Posts: 903 | Location: sweden | Registered: Tue 05 July 2005 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
svetty
when i got my 202 new together with an old FC2 i didn't like the 202 powered by the cap. didn't make a lot of difference at all (to my ears). others swear by it though.
keep us posted - this is always interesting me thinks.
regards,bf -- say NO to AUX2!
|
| |
| Posts: 2316 | Location: Berlin | Registered: Fri 25 November 2005 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
RiNo: Not ordered the NAPSC yet - I'm sure I will as the upgradeitis is strong within me (to paraphrase Yoda)
BF: Sure, I'll have a listen when it comes and report back
|
| |
| Posts: 619 | Location: Yorkshire | Registered: Fri 06 October 2006 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
quote: Not ordered the NAPSC yet
this you later shall May 4th be with you 
|
| |
| Posts: 903 | Location: sweden | Registered: Tue 05 July 2005 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
quote: Not ordered the NAPSC yet
The napsc makes a very significant difference for the £250 it costs, and I would not want to use a 202 without it. Nigel
|
| |
| Posts: 5439 | Location: Where the streets are crammed with things, eager to be held... | Registered: Sun 27 April 2003 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
Does the napsc offer a better improvement to the 202 compared with the fc2? What i mean is using one instead of the other, i believe they can be both used. If only one were available which is better?
|
| |
| Posts: 1407 | Location: Dunoon, Argyll | Registered: Wed 21 December 2005 |   |
|
Member
|
I would weight the benefits as FC2 60%, NAPSC 40%.
But remember the NAPSC is half the price.
|
| |
| Posts: 482 | Location: Aberdeenshire | Registered: Wed 21 May 2003 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
quote: Originally posted by blackforest: svetty
when i got my 202 new together with an old FC2 i didn't like the 202 powered by the cap. didn't make a lot of difference at all (to my ears). others swear by it though.
keep us posted - this is always interesting me thinks.
regards,bf -- say NO to AUX2!
You're not alone Chris.... 
|
| |
| Posts: 779 | Location: in between speakers... | Registered: Sat 07 January 2006 |   |
|
Senior Member
|
quote: Does the napsc offer a better improvement to the 202 compared with the fc2
i thought so... the napsc is a nice little upgrade _ not more not less. i find it bit over the top to say it's a HUGE upgrade. better separation and more depth (perhaps a bit more blackness and a tad tighter bass) are the effects. but it's one more box ;( regards,christian ps> haven't heard the hicap w/ my 202 though so far. this should be a bigger step (i hope so at least). regards,bf.
|
| |
| Posts: 2316 | Location: Berlin | Registered: Fri 25 November 2005 |   |
|