Visit the Naim E-Store
Naim Audio Main Website    forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Naim Users  Hop To Forums  Hi-Fi Corner    MMMMaana!
Page 1 2 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Tools
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
Folks. Please help.
I am still finding after time and a change of house that the CDX still has that 'glare' about it that spoils my enjoyment. I have heard the XPS and agree with others that with the power supply the CDX suddenly all falls into place and finally renders it more listenable.( but 2 grand more !!!! please!)
I am in no doubt that I will get shot down in flames for this but, if I were of a more cynical bias I might suggest that it was a marketing ploy that you buy a player which is just not quite there ( even though it still costs a packet) and are then offered the solution in the handy form of another black box that is...surprise!.....another 2 grand ! Does anyone else feel the same ?

Following on to a solution and this may be a daft question, but does the Mana reference 'shelf' work the same as a ref table. I am thinking here of a CDX on top of it and whether it will give an improvement near that of an XPS ?
Si
ps: I do like Naim really (its just my uninformed opinion !!!)
 
Posts: 46 | Location: Sunny Brighton | Registered: Thu 03 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
does the Mana reference 'shelf' work the same as a ref table?

Yes, except it's not on the floor. You also can't upgrade its phase with soundstages, although you can with flattops or reference tops - I'm at phase 6 now.

I've never heard an XPS, but I understand from others who have that it does give the same level of improvement. YMMV.

John

 
Posts: 2918 | Location: The Fife Riviera | Registered: Tue 24 October 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Mark Tucker>
Posted
Simon

By all means investigate stands/platforms for your player, but please give us some credit where it's due!

As the CDX' transformer and power supply components are inside the same case as the sensitive digital and audio electronics there is of course a limit on sound quality, as with all integrated players; the XPS solves this.

If we'd made the CDX so that it could only work with an XPS you wouldn't have had the flexibilty of buying the combination in stages.

Hardly a marketing ploy, surely?

 
Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
...if Naim built the CDX to the standard of the CDX+XPS, then (as a single box) it would surely be quite a bit more expensive and the jump in the hierarchy would be difficult (i.e. CD5->CDX would be, what, 3000UKP+ or something - a difficult amount to swallow!)

FWIW, not many manufacturers allow their CD players to be upgraded this way, so hats off to Naim for giving us all the choice.

John (who doesn't yet own a Naim CD player, but it's on the cards)

PS. Paul S @Naim, went over to L&C yesterday, saw the Aro, everything is A1, you have one satisfied customer in me (albeit indirectly, as it's s/h) but, rest assured, I now understand what people refer to when they talk about the excellent service from Naim!

 
Posts: 2918 | Location: The Fife Riviera | Registered: Tue 24 October 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Si

Interesting. I wonder if you're really serious.

I believe Naims' strategy is very good. It allows all sorts of upgrading through various components. The ability to buy a pre/power-amp then upgrade by simply adding a power supply. The fact that supplies can be used with alternative pre/power combinations is good stuff. You never have to sell everything to get an upgrade as you do with other manufacturers. Even the integrated amplifier can be turned into a preamp.

With respect to the CDX, the XPS is offered as an upgrade which can also be used with the CDS2 later. If Naim really wanted to rip people off this wouldn't be the case would it?

All of this is pretty obvious and well known to everyone. I'm just trying to get across that Naim could easily have designed the power supplies for the CDS2 and CDX to be incompatible. They didn't. It seems to me that upgrading through Naim equipment is made pretty easy with as little waste as possible as equipment is replaced.

If a Mana whatever turns out to improve your CDX in the same way the XPS does, what you'd need to ask yourself then is, how will it sound now with the XPS. wink

Brian

 
Posts: 873 | Registered: Tue 01 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon,
Firstly let me assure you that the CDX is a fine player. I have one and ran it for a year quite happily before getting an XPS for it. The support you mention does improve the sound considerably too. So much so that I actually prefer the CDX/XPS to the CDS2/XPS.

Finally, think back to when you bought the CDX and what you compared it to. I'm sure it outclassed the opposition as it was then and probably still would now. It's just that you have options to take it even further.

Regards

Nei

 
Posts: 81 | Location: UK | Registered: Tue 01 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
I have no problems to be cinical and criticize everythin including Naim and Mark Tucker - but I think that in this point Simon is wrong.

I own a CDi which I think is not better than the CDX - and the CDI stands for itself as a great player. I guess the same goes with the CDX.
So the CDX suppose to be a great playar for the money and when one is able to, he can get the XPS.
I think that asking why the XPS is not in the CDX case is almost like asking why the 52 electronics is not in the 82 case - so if somene hasn't enough money he buys a 82 although he knows when buying that there is a 52 which is a better one.
There is a CDX AND there is a cdx with XPS.
If you have a cdx, you have to buy the XPS only in order to get the second cd player.

Arie

 
Posts: 2008 | Location: Haifa, Israel | Registered: Sat 09 September 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
If you don't want to spend £2,000 on an XPS you could always look around for a 2nd hand CDSPS.

There are a few available from people upgrading their CDS1 to CDS2.

I got one for £475. About 75% of the performance of an XPS for 25% of the price.

Matt

 
Posts: 218 | Location: Leeds, UK | Registered: Mon 31 July 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
MrI
Member
Posted Hide Post
Getting away from the obvious benefits of external power supplies, I simply want to address the issue of harshness in the cdx.

I have had mine since October 1999 and I had serious reservations about keeping it even after 4 months of trying everything to get rid of a harsh top end. This harshness did not occur when it was brought to a friend's place.
My cdx took a couple of weeks to 'calm down' and then was still almost unlistenable. This is trying all sorts of isolation schemes and vukwich inspired piles of boards/glass and nut/ball bearings. I had put it in the exact location where I had enjoyed a 3.5 for some time.

I still think the cdx is a marvellous machine and listen to it everynight, but is highly (insanely?) sensitive to the setup/stand issue. In my mdf cabinet on perfectly level isolation, the cdx was not listenable. I tried at least a dozen combinations without success. However, I did find a solution when I put the cdx on three Clearlight audio cones. Something in my setup at home was really affecting the cdp badly and these (only) gave me some peace. I presume that I was unable to isolate it sufficiently well without the cones. Now it is at phase 3 Mana and going to phase 4 soon. This was an enormous and unexpectedly fine upgrade.

The bottom line for me is that the cdx was highly sensitive to my siting. Get a good stand of your choice, level it and then hear the reason you bought it. It may be a fantastic player with an XPS, to me it is excellent without.

 
Posts: 44 | Location: Snow Belt, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Thu 18 January 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon;

quote:
I am still finding after time and a change of house that the CDX still has that 'glare' about it that spoils my enjoyment. I have heard the XPS and agree with others that with the power supply the CDX suddenly all falls into place and finally renders it more listenable.

You don't say how much time you've given it. The received wisdom is that the CDX takes at least 3 weeks of "Repeat" before even approaching its potential. I heard a CDX /82/180/Intro2 at last years' Bristol Show, and although it was abviously a class act and very enjoyable, there was much about the performance which gave the impression of "new cold Naim". It turned out the entire system was less than a week old, so this made good sense.

Thinking that a used CDX was the way to go, I had a well-cooked demo model at home for about 48 hours, and found it better, but still too "glary" and fatiguing for the money, even at a used price. With hindsight, I think it would probably have improved quite a lot had I been able to leave it longer, but I didn't wish to stretch my relationship with the (quite eXcellent !) dealer too far. Obviously this is not a universal finding with the CDX, as there are plenty of happy users on the forum – so there must be some way of avoiding the problem you have found.

The consensus seems to be that the CDX is particularly sensitive to supports and general setup, so in your place I would begin by rethinking the entire installation from scratch, in particular trying to keep power supplies as far away from it as you can. No doubt you will get plenty of recommendations about, um, stands…

My impression is that the CDSII gives you everything without compromise, the CDX compromises on refinement rather than fudging the musical issues, and the CD5 compromises on everything, but to a lesser degree than one would expect when looking at the price list. This constitutes an entirely logical range of players, and if you factor in the XPS-ability of the CDX, it's an excellent stop on the path to a CDSII.

I just wish it would take a HiCap as an interim measure!

Best;

Mark

(an imperfect
forum environment is
better than none)

 
Posts: 1113 | Location: Western UK | Registered: Thu 17 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
OK OK! I think I get the message.
Maybe my comments were a bit strong. I know that having power supplies and audio electric in one box will compromise the sound.
Its just that in IMHO I find the single box player too harsh and glaring. I have tried moving the player around in different locations and could not seem to get a reasonable sound. I have also tried different stands underneath it. Maybe my expectations were too high and I am a bit frustrated by the upgrade spiral that I, like many others, have got into.It feels a bit frustrating to have to shell out another 2 grand so soon after the initial expense. Sorry, but The bare CDX just didnt work for me.
Now the CDS 2 is another story........!
Sorry I offended so many of you
Si
 
Posts: 46 | Location: Sunny Brighton | Registered: Thu 03 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon;
Try it (all of it) on a wooden structure.

I have recently been converted to wood as a support material and have built something in faced chip-board (Yes; chipboard) and now have ambient space and background information; hitherto missing on steel framed racks.

The sound is also smoother and warmer. The downside is that it does slow things down a bit.

I can put up with that for the information and spatial ambience, previousy missing.

Try it on a coffee table etc:

 
Posts: 328 | Location: Norfolk U.K. | Registered: Fri 25 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon,

quote:
Sorry, but The bare CDX just didnt work for me.

Fair enough, but what are your options? If another company made a preferable CD player at the price, you and many others would have bought it.

Joe

 
Posts: 1354 | Location: U.S. of eh | Registered: Tue 29 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon,

quote:
Maybe my expectations were too high and I am a bit frustrated by the upgrade spiral that I, like many others, have got into. It feels a bit frustrating to have to shell out another 2 grand so soon after the initial expense.

You must have been satisfied with the CDX, presumably after a home-demo, to part with your money, no? Of course there is always something better if you are prepared to pay more money. A spiralling upgrade path Naim certainly has, but you should be in control of yours.

quote:
Now the CDS 2 is another story........!

More money, more music, more expectations. At least the CDX will function without the XPS wink .

James (keeping his CD2 until the laser dies or the Borg assimilates the Lottery Machine)

Resistance is Futile

 
Posts: 2667 | Location: Middle Earth | Registered: Tue 08 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Trade Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon-

Just discovered this earlier today while re-assembling a repair unit, though this may be obvious to some...

Both the CDX and the CD5 share (though implemented differently) a three-point mounting for the tray pivot--three screws are used to adjust the forward / sideways position of the tray relative to the rest of the chassis.

Once this has been properly set up (at the factory, typically), there is a small silver hex screw that should then be rotated (outward) against the bottom of the chassis--if this is loose or screwed inward, the mechanical coupling between the pivot and the chassis is diminished, and, consequentially, so is the performance.

If this is unclear, please contact your dealer or Naim directly (if you are in the U.K.).

Hope this helps,
Dave Dever, NANA

 
Posts: 2445 | Location: Niles/Chicago, Illinois, USA | Registered: Mon 31 July 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon,

As a consumer the world is your Hi-Fi shop.

If there's another machine at CDX price level, that offers a musically satisfying performance, and overcomes the problems you find with the CDX, why don't you buy it (and then let us all know about it) wink

Andy.

Andrew L. Weekes
alweekes@audiophile.com

 
Posts: 2391 | Location: Kent, UK. | Registered: Mon 31 July 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Simon,

I have listen to a CDX (but alas in a Linn kairn/LK140/AV5140 system), and I don't want to blame anyone ( Linn amps and speakers, CD player, matching between the 2) but the ensemble was offering a dull sound compared to my karik/kairn/active kabers set up.

in this system the CDX was also clearly trounced by the Linn Ikemi.
therefore I decided not to go with the CDX (but I suspect i might come from the CDX/kairn mismatch)

(too bad for me, looking for a CD player for living alongside my LP12)

regards
Jean-christophe

 
Posts: 577 | Location: Brittany - France | Registered: Tue 03 October 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Mark Tucker>
Posted
Simon

quote:
Sorry I offended so many of you

You certainly didn't offend me, I just wanted to throw some balance back into the discussion! wink

If you're not happy with the CDX perhaps there's something wrong with it? I think it's worth having it checked before dismissing it, we'll be happy to look at it for you free of charge...


Arie

quote:
I have no problems to be cinical and criticize everythin including Naim and Mark Tucker

Yeah, I had noticed!

No problem with this , Arie, it all adds to the fun, especially when you go off on one!
Love it wink

 
Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
A lot of the apparent glare with all electronics (maybe especially the CDX) can be resolved with the judicious use of mains cable/mains supply. I know there's a general consensus that using the supplied cables is the way to go, but personally I favour Kimber powerkords as they seem to clean up the sound just a bit without losing PRAT. The other thing you can do, highly irregularly (look up Greg Beatty on the subject) is remove the fuse in the mains plug. This is hugely better. Then go for the house-rewiring option (probably unlikely).

By the way, do users in continental Europe (where plugs do not carry fuses) experience better sound as a result?

I also agree with using wood as a support - I have Projekt stands which make the CDX very smooth (but very musical).

 
Posts: 726 | Location: Cirencester, Glos | Registered: Mon 31 July 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
If you bought this CDX from a Naim dealer, I would suggest taking it back to compare with other CDXs.
I abandoned Naim gear for years after owning a very noisey and harsh 72/HiCap/140 (bought new).
After about a year I just traded it in for an American amp. It now seems that there was a fault with on of the Naim boxes from the outset, but I never thought of that. I know that makes me a bit dim, but it is a possibility with your CDX.
Malcolm roll eyes
 
Posts: 2722 | Location: Bromley | Registered: Sat 04 November 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  

Closed Topic Closed

Naim Audio Main Website    forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Naim Users  Hop To Forums  Hi-Fi Corner    MMMMaana!

© Naim Audio Ltd, 2006.