Which combination is the best option?
They are both in the same price range. Should I go for the better pre- or poweramp?
Or in which way do these combos differ?

Theo

I guess that 202/150 is better than 112/200 but you have to test it by yourself.

Arye

Hi Theo

202/150 is the way to go. The 150 gives about 75% of the 200. The 112 gives 50% of a 202, even with a cap (sorry 112 owners). Then you add a PS2 to the 202, no competition.

Colin

202 all the way.

i agree,202/150....imho the 202 is probably the best value in the line

I had a 112/150 then when I heard a 202 is totally blew the 112 away - it really allows the 150 to do its stuff.

202/150 is a no-brainer IMO.

Regards,

JonR

What about the 112x v 202 ?

I assume Theo will be buying New so the 112x would be on the agenda

anyone donr the dem 112 v 112x ?

Mark

What is the improvment between the 2 upgrade from 112/150?

Example: 112/200 --> at least the system now can drive a harder load (in spec).


Example No.2: 202/150 --> Could hear more details (hear say).


How about sound wise? Could describe?

Regards
Wayne

quote:

---

Originally posted by maserluv:
What is the improvment between the 2 upgrade from 112/150?

Example: 112/200 --> at least the system now can drive a harder load (in spec).


Example No.2: 202/150 --> Could hear more details (hear say).


How about sound wise? Could describe?

Regards
Wayne

---

Hi Wayne, you'd a Private Topic.

Sorry to interrupt.