Visit the Naim E-Store
Naim Audio Main Website    forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Naim Users  Hop To Forums  Hi-Fi Corner    Speaker auditions-so far ...
Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Tools
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
No I couldn't get on with the Shahinian's. not enpugh definition for me and (in my room) the bass 'wallowed' - as soon as they went on my wife came in and said "That's awful, it's all bass". Maybe the room. As I said earlier, try the JM Lab 927be - £2700 which is about your budget and sound fantastic (to my ears, of course!)
 
Posts: 68 | Location: West Midlands | Registered: Mon 17 May 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I think I'll wait and see what happens in the next couple of weeks before deciding whether to chase the Neats again. I've been persuaded that the elites will not do it for me on the bass front at least with my amp (which I'm not changing!).


Ian,

You probably read my debacle with the Elites. They did not work with the 200 in my room at all. ( altho, they had plenty of good things going! )

I had a 300 here for a while but I wasn't motivated to put 'em through it. I would still love to home dem the MF5 or 7s but that will be difficult.

I might be able to try the new ATC SCM35 which would be interesteing. I was encouraged that your 200 was able to drive them. ( not sure if they can do heavy electronica and percussive pieces at high SPL? )

quote:
Once I've done that I'll see how the balance between itchy wallet and exhaustion looks.


I am amased that you have been diligent and patient.
Very thorough.

p.s. If you like the traits of the 200, moving up to the 250.2 isn't necessarily a upgrade. Smile
 
Posts: 12227 | Location: mybriks.com | Registered: Thu 11 September 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Alan,
I'll watch out for that boomy bass tonight but I didn't notice it last night at all.

Riitta decreed she couldn't live with the bug-eye tweeter on the front so we have not listened to the JM lab range at all. Perhaps our loss Frown


Ian
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Kuma,

You referred earlier on to new 'taller' versions of the SCM35s. I asked the dealer about that and he had no info. The pair I listened to were 87cm high as described in the current brochure on the ATC web site. Do you know if these are already the 'new taller ' ones ?? You're probably right about the 200 struggling to push the SCM35s to really high SPLs on high-energy music - but they went plenty loud in my house for the occasional cobweb removal.

A clearer picture of the Arcs emerged after some extended listening last night but I'll keep my powder dry until I'm sure my opinions have stabilised - they sure are different tho'.

Ian
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
IanGtoo,

I've had my ARCs now a few weeks and have been playing with the positioning of them quite a bit. They are different I agree but in a good way.

In the main, what I have found is that positioning is not critical (as Shahinian will tell you). However they do say keep them away from corners (perhaps obvious) and tow them in towards the listener. I've found this to be good advice. Mine are towed in quite a bit, nearly 45 deg.

If I place them too near the rear wall (50-75cm) they do sound heavy on the bass. Bring them out and they sound leaner and faster but still giving rich, controlled bass.

The thing I find with the ARCs and Shahinian in general (I also owned their baby Elfs) they sound very open and natural. I think this is one reason they do sound "different" Some might replace different with "right" but I don't have enough experience of listening to different speakers (have heard Allaes; Neat MFS more recently) to be honest but to me the ARCs give great insight into the music and I like the rich bass and detail.

Some also say the Shahinian speakers don't do rock or pop. I cannot see why people say this. They are fast, articulate speakers and do a great job of disappearing aurally. I was listening to some trancy dub (Banco de Gaia) stuff the other night and the back ground wall of bass was unbelievable.

Keep listening.

Bruce
 
Posts: 542 | Location: Durban | Registered: Thu 01 February 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Ian
What bug-eyed tweeter? It is aluminium looking and there is a metal cover which is very attractive and doesn't detract too much from the sound.
Good luck - this Hi Fi changing is very stressful.
I just tried a 250 and after 2 weeks still prefer my 140 - Is it me? 'Er indoors hated the sound of the 250 also!! Wallowy bass and not the transparency of the 140.
 
Posts: 68 | Location: West Midlands | Registered: Mon 17 May 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Ian,

If you don't get on with the Shahinians, and are looking to hear something a bit different, you're welcome to pop over to hear my Virgos. A different presentation again, electrostatic speed, perhaps a little lighter in the bass than most speakers their size, but well worth hearing. There is a dealer over in Glenrothes. I could let you hear my pair on the end of an LP12/Aro/Geddon/Nait2.

Just say the word...

John
 
Posts: 2918 | Location: The Fife Riviera | Registered: Tue 24 October 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
hi,

Another evening with the ARCs and a pattern has emerged over a lot of different kinds of music.

First the good. As advertised these speakers are rather insensitive to positioning. They produce a room filling sound which seems to float in the room rather than coming directly from the speakers. They do simple vocals very well. Their bass goes very deep especially for such small boxes.

Now the not so good. (note it is not really the bad Big Grin) They seem not to cope well with complex pieces. IMHO it all get bit garbled. Perhaps our odd shaped room is playing havoc with reflections. They can also suffer from over much bass. This is evident on some tracks where the vocal becomes submerged in the background.

I never really found my attention grabbed by their ability to 'rock' when we tried some old Zepplin or The Who.

So in summary, both the competition they were up against (ATC SCM35s and LV Avatar) consistently provided us track after track
with 'wow, isn't that amazing' moments - albeit rarely on the same music. The ARCs, apart from their wonderfully airy presentation didn't do that very often.

So they'll be going back and the decision gets one step closer.

A few specific responses:

Bruce: I'm glad your enjoying your ARCS, I tried some different placements but as you say the changes are slight. Different strokes for different folks.

Alan B. Choosing hifi shouldn't be stressful, I find it fun. As I said a few posts back I could be very happily with the ATCs, so I'm just checking there is nothing better for us out there.

Top Cat : I think I sent you an email re your kind offer.

Ian
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
You referred earlier on to new 'taller' versions of the SCM35s. I asked the dealer about that and he had no info.



Ian,

My dealer told me that the ATC decided to revise the original 35 to get the drivers mounted higher.
I sort of understand it since my niggle with the previous pair was a less linear bass. The bass seemed to be a tad full and slower.

Other than that my understanding is that there are no other changes in parts or xovers.

I am not sure of what's up on the ATC website. I'd think that the appearance would be exactly the same as the previous version.

So... the ATC vs. LV.. interesting...
 
Posts: 12227 | Location: mybriks.com | Registered: Thu 11 September 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Ian,

I have listened recently to Spendor Classic series SP1/2 and SP100 with CDX2 and 200.

The sound is fantastic; far better in my advice that the S series (S8, S9).
 
Posts: 68 | Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada | Registered: Fri 04 October 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Kuma,

Thanks for that clarification - I misunderstood and thought you meant a physically taller cabinet not just moving the drivers.

yep the ATC vs. LV is non-trivial - they are both so good at different things. Unfortunately one member of the household is leaning one way and I'm leaning the other way! We'll get the LV (& naim) dealer over to the house as he was confident he could fix the remaining issues we have with the LVs given his setup experience. And he's been (as usual) so helpful, I'd frankly like to give him the business.

Watch this space (but only if you have nothing better to do !)

Ian
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Here’s another speaker suggestion.

A bit of background – my Naim setup is similar to yours, although most of it is older (CDX2/82/Supercap/250), and my room is a similar size. The system dates from 1996 and at the time after a lot of listening I settled on a pair of Epos ES22 speakers. On rock music these speakers really excel, with a sound that rocks far more than most other speakers I’ve heard without being as uncomfortably forward as the Naim SBL of its day. The CDX2 is capable of producing very deep bass and the ES22 delivers this better than any sub silly-money speaker I’ve heard. Ought to add that the ES22 – which is a floor standing speaker - works very well on its three layers of Mana stands with better overall clarity and deeper bass than when standing on its own.

The Epos brand disappeared a few years ago but has re-appeared as part of the Creek family with substantially similar designs and the ES22 has become the M22. Why not give them a try ?
 
Posts: 11 | Location: West of London | Registered: Sat 16 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by IanGtoo:
Well some masochists suggested I let you know how I get on with my speaker auditions so here goes.

Firstly apologies to those in another thread who suggested Fraim first - I just 'cannae dae it' before speakers.

What follows is a bit of a mixed & (windy) bag but I had to eliminate many of the possibilities to narrow it down to the real contenders.

Room is about 7m x 4m. The rest of the system is CDX2/202/NAPSC/200 and LP12/LVX/stageline.

Music tastes are varied: female vocals/Jazz piano/classic Rock/Celtic and a little classical. ( i.e. anything I or Riitta likes !)

Current speakers are 25 year old Mission 770's and budget is 2.5K pounds


Auditions at dealer A:

Long session (with same source & amp as mine ) and

Proac D15 : Good textured bass, accurate, slightly veiled mid/upper range put me off.

Living Voice Auditoriums : pretty good all-round - worth another listen in round 2!

Sonus Faber Auditors: I love stroking these speakers - but they did not do it for me sonically. Lovely for vocals and piano but didn't paint the whole picture.

I realise at this point that I'm going to end up 'diss-ing half the forum but the usual 'my ears only' riders apply doubly to speakers.


Martin-Logan Clarity: Hybrid Electrostatic/conventional. I've always had a soft spot for Quad ESLs so was interested to hear these. All the expected ES sparkle
was there as was the signal from the other drive units. Not too sure how
intergrated they were. Interesting idea tho'. Riitta is unlikely to tolerate their tall ES grilles anyhow.

That was enough for one day and I went away not having had my sock blown off by any of them really.


Today's Auditions at dealer B:

Unfortunately not a Naim dealer so used an Exposure CDplayer/amp to weed out the home dem candidates.

Spendor s8e: I liked these, very neutral and composed. Perhaps a little polite on rock music.

PMC OB1's : funny these - my brain told me they were rather good in all departments - my gut told me to get the next pair of speakers in! They just didn't get me involved. Perhaps showing up the Exposure ?? Dunno, dealer claimed they were a good match to Naim and I should try them at home.

Elac (somethings) - sorry I didn't write the model number down ( 1600 pounds, ribbon tweeter,) I found these rather bright and in-my face - "GOOD HIFI, 'INNIT", if you get my drift. Not for me but I'm sure they measure great in a lab test.

Harbeth Compact 7ES2, - These speaker are very good at what they seem designed for - midrange vocals, very engaging for that type of music.I just felt I was listening through a filter chopping off the top and bottom.

Next tried to break the bank and listened to the

Spendor s9e : these are better than the s8e's but whether they are a grand (=a new hicap) better I remain to be convinced. However both Spendors remain definite maybes.

So the outcome of that is that I liked (both) the Spendors enough to try them at home sometime soon.

I wonder if the PMC's would fit well with my Naim kit (anyone wanna encourage me to bring these home too ??)

There is a third dealer here in town who stocks Neat and ATC speakers but is keener on home demos than shop demos so right now I'm listening to some Neat Mystiques here at home. I really wanted to hear the Elite SE's, but he didn't have any in the shop so I have the Mystiques to see if is worth him ordering some in. I have to say I'm impressed with these little babes, very cohesive and musical. They
suffer a little from being a small box (I'll try them against the back wall later). They remind me a little of Kans (which I last heard over 25 years ago so I could be well off) - but they just follow the tunes so well. I think I'll be trying to hear what the Elites can do. Their size is excellent for our layout too.

Sitting in the Kitchen I have a pair of ATC 35's from the same dealer. I've resisted putting them in until the Mystiques have has a good workout. But that is my fun for tomorrow night.


And before anyone suggests Allaes thay are on my list too - but the dealer in Edinburgh doesn't have any at the moment - perhaps a trip to Glasgow is on the cards.


Whew ... time to give the ears a rest and watch the footy.

Ian
 
Posts: 5 | Registered: Thu 18 March 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I plumped for the Spendor s8e`s after auditioning the PMC OB1`s as I felt the PMC`s sounded very harsh with my Naim gear CDX2/202/Hi-Cap/250.2
 
Posts: 5 | Registered: Thu 18 March 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
... and the winner is ... The Living Voice Avatar IIs.

They will be ordered tomorrow when the dealer opens up again.

Last Thursday they were brought over and set-up properly in my room. Initially they sounded as before, a little bass light and lacking in real grunt. Then, as Living Voice recommend, we tried some bi-wired cable. Big change, more depth, more clarity. I was gobsmacked since I am (or was) a big sceptic when it comes to bi-wiring.

Finally we ditched the TV which was sitting between the speakers, and the whole sound opened up beautifully. The midrange got sweeter and the bass tightened up. The music sounded great.

So the weekend was spent re-arranging the living room to put the TV elsewhere and listening to lots of tunes.

The choice between the ATC SCM35 and the Avatars has not been an easy one. These are both great loudspeakers. The Avatars have a delicacy of presentation which is beguiling, sound good at low volume, and look very elegant. The ATCs can rock it up, play all kind of music in a convincing way and have great low end grunt. On the down side they need a bit more volume to come to life.

In the end the balance came out in favour of the Avatars but only by a whisker.

So thanks to all of you who helped and encouraged us through in this adventure and I hope the LV delivery time is not too long - plugging the Missions back in will be a bit of a come down!


Ian

PS If anyone else had their telly between their speakers, try taking it out, you might be amazed too.
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Ian,

Congratulations on reaching your decision. Now comes that uncertain period between placing the order and wondering when your new speakers will arrive!

I hope it's not too long and I'm sure they will give you many years of happy listening enjoyment, as I am finding with my Spendor S5es which I bought last year.

Cheers,

Jon
 
Posts: 6114 | Location: Hert-fd-shr | Registered: Wed 25 February 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Congrats Ian and thanks for your very informative speaker search thread.

I think the LV would be ultimately a better choice over the ATC with your 200. This amp really shines when you give it a wider headroom.

Enjoy!
 
Posts: 12227 | Location: mybriks.com | Registered: Thu 11 September 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Congratulations Ian, at last another LV owner!
I hope you will be as happy with yours as i am with mine Winker

Out of interest what bi-wire cable did you try? My Avatars are currently using a single run of NACA5. I did try some chord biwire cable for a short while but went back to NACA5 in the end.

Best regards

Hawk
 
Posts: 863 | Location: Herts | Registered: Thu 01 January 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hawk:
Out of interest what bi-wire cable did you try? My Avatars are currently using a single run of NACA5. I did try some chord biwire cable for a short while but went back to NACA5 in the end.


Chord Rumour. My dealer is rather down on NACA5 and he's been right in everything so far so I've tended to follow his advice. But statistics on this forum seem pretty clearly in favour of NACA 5. Perhaps I'll borrow some once the speakers get run in.

Ian
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
So finally almost a week after their 'expected' arrival date our new Avatars made it to the house last night. The timing couldn't have been worse - I had a 9.30am deadline to meet this morning, which meant working until 1am and getting up at 5am to finish it off. So not much listening there. Frown And we're heading off for the weekend up to the Highlands, then Monday night is out too since I have a business dinner commitment(which sounds posher than it is). THEN we have a visitor staying until Thursday and I'm out of town for work Friday and Saturday!

So I figure I should get to listen to the CD of my choice on the afternoon of the 1st of May. Eek

Maybe I should just rent speakers!! Roll Eyes

Anyhow, the avatars look real slick flanking the rest of the system and should be nicely run in by the time I get to apply the ears. I'll post some photos in the 2005 thread once I get a minute.

Sorry for the rant but I feel better now!

Ian
 
Posts: 1843 | Location: Edinburgh, Scotland | Registered: Fri 08 October 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5  

Closed Topic Closed

Naim Audio Main Website    forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Naim Users  Hop To Forums  Hi-Fi Corner    Speaker auditions-so far ...

© Naim Audio Ltd, 2006.