DD@NANA said: 230 VAC in the U.S. is NOT the same as 230 VAC in the U.K.--ask your electrician.
-> DD@NANA is right...230vAC in the US is 'almost perfectly balanced' mains, assuming the 'coil outside' is 'almost symmetrically opposing 115vAC legs', unlike in the UK where it is 'unbalanced 230vAC' much like standard (non cooker) 'unbalanced 115vAC' in the US, that most of us use.
i have measured a lower noise floor (for analog bits) and significantly lower jitter (for digital bits) with non-hifi kit, when going balanced (mains) in the US. This does not necessarily imply that naim kit (in the US) would work better
(read: play more enjoyable music) when seeing a balanced supply, even if all naim boxes had their secondaries centre tapped to signal ground.
IIRC, NANA has not tested this (as yet), whether NAUK has addressed it, i dunno.
what does make me curious (based on my limited understanding of the NAP500, given that naim reasoned to 'balance' it's load outputs...for possibly unrelated reasons)...perhaps it is worth evaluating what a 'balanced' mains supply (at least in the US) does ? (and i mean w/o using kit like PSAudio etc.).
DD@NANA said: You will get consistent results with the proper UL-listed AC mains cable/fuse rating when using a properly-wired/earthed receptacle.
-> for 'anal' readers
1. users with NEC code specified 'orange, isolated ground' receptacles...it is worthwhile to note that the 'earth conductor' is not in contact with the conduit's (presumably dirtier) earth, anywhere upstream towards the supply station, something you may never know.
2. if you really wanna get the benefits of a 'perfectly' balanced supply (that attempts eliminating ground loops etc.) you should really have it 'see' identical loads, implying PSs with identical ratings 'and' load useage....ha!
I believe there is (at least) one US resident who powers naim kit via (balanced ??) 230vAC...perhaps MarkT@naim
can comment 