Visit the Naim E-Store
Naim Audio Main Website    forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Naim Users  Hop To Forums  Music Room    Audiophile CDs
Page 1 2 3 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Tools
  Login/Join 
Senior Member
Posted
Hi all,

I don't post on this forum too much, so please forgive me, but based on my own frustrations locating audiophile sounding CDs, I was wondering if poeple can post on this thread the audiophile sounding CDs they have or have heard.

I think it would be great use as you cannot always tell what the fidelity will be like when you buy a CD. I sometimes prefer CDs because of the sound quality and not the content.

Many thanks in anticipation!

Jon
 
Posts: 540 | Location: Warwick | Registered: Fri 13 May 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Consciousmess:
I sometimes prefer CDs because of the sound quality and not the content.

Jon


Ah ha. No wonder I don't get the "audiophile" disc scene. I'd rather listen to something I like whatever it's sonic limitations.

If I find a some interesting music that has been given a first rate recording, or a favourite disc gets the SHM/MFSL treatment, great. But the kind of stuff you often find on audiophile releases, or err, manufacturer's samplers is not my cuppa. No matter how well presented.

Steve
 
Posts: 3275 | Location: Weald | Registered: Sat 05 November 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Consciousmess:
Hi all,

I don't post on this forum too much, so please forgive me, but based on my own frustrations locating audiophile sounding CDs, I was wondering if poeple can post on this thread the audiophile sounding CDs they have or have heard.

I think it would be great use as you cannot always tell what the fidelity will be like when you buy a CD. I sometimes prefer CDs because of the sound quality and not the content.

Many thanks in anticipation!

Jon


Bloomin heck where do you start.

Apart from that a list is only dependant on how many versions/cat no's a person has heard of a particular disc.

What type of music do you like?
 
Posts: 1964 | Location: The Highlands | Registered: Mon 16 October 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
As this is in the Music Room, I shall say what I think. I am feeling less and less at ease in the confines of the Hifi corner, where consideration of music - rather than simply sound as replayed, which is a rather different proposition in my book - seems to have completely slipped off the agenda. Shame really as Naim used to be considered the most musical and possibly least Hifi obsessive of the better makes of gramophone.

On audiophile recordings, I have never found one that contains anything like the best music making. On audiophile re-releases, I have never found one that pleased, as the original is always better! I mean it - if the original recording is adequate then there is no reason to fiddle with what the artists approved for release, and if the original record is in poor condition, then I find that the best restorations invariably come from the original issuer of the recording, whose staff may well still number among them people who worked on the original recording, and who are best placed to make decisions on restoration of it based on their inside knowledge gained from working with the artists concerned.

I dare say that obsessing about which brand new recordings, transfers and remasters are the best from a sonic technical point of view is a fascinating topic, and a worthy hobby, but to me the whole thing is a nonsense from the musical standpoint for the reasons already mentioned.

No amount of fine quality recording and replay quality will rescue dull music or music making! But great music making will survive almost any amount of grim recorded sound. Just listen to the toon, and you can soon forget the sonics!

ATB from George
 
Posts: 10879 | Location: Worcester, UK | Registered: Sat 09 July 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Dear George,

you are right, the music is far more important than the sound quality. Bad music does not become better, when only the sound is very good.

But we are members of the Naim forum. I had to spend a lot of money to buy my system and I got an excellent sound quality for my money. To enjoy my system, I need at least good recordings. It makes no sense for me to listen to very old recordings unable to distinguish between a violin and a trumpet. In this case, even the best artist and music are imo unbearable.

There are many good recordings on the market, containing fine sound and excellent music. I am looking for these. To replay old mono recordings from the thirties, a Naim system is too good.

Best wishes

Manfred
 
Posts: 155 | Location: Neuss, Germany | Registered: Mon 19 August 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Jon

Kickin it at the barn – Little Feat

Excellent sound quality. Musically their best CD in the last 15 years
 
Posts: 489 | Registered: Mon 28 January 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Manni:
To replay old mono recordings from the thirties, a Naim system is too good.



If a music system is worth it's cost, then a dire recording from the 30's should be more fun, not less.


A system that only plays 'audiophile' records is no sound system I would want to own.
 
Posts: 109 | Registered: Wed 16 January 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post


In my opinion, sound quality should serve the music, never the other way around. However, good music is well served by good sound quality. Bad sound can't lessen the musical quality of good music, but it might lessen the quality of one's listening pleasure.

That said, I'm surprised no one has mentioned the excellent sonic, and musical, quality of many recordings right here on the Naim label. Yes, I have a self-interest in this, but I would honestly feel the same way even if I didn't.

For excellent audiophile sound quality I suggest this album ... and I think the music is pretty good, too!





All the best,
Fred


 
Posts: 1760 | Location: Anytown, USA | Registered: Sat 12 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Hi Fred,

you wrote:

quote:
Bad sound can't lessen the musical quality of good music, but it might lessen the quality of one's listening pleasure.


That is exactly the point. It is impossible for me to enjoy music that is hidden behind a wall of distortion and hiss.

Best wishes

Manfred
 
Posts: 155 | Location: Neuss, Germany | Registered: Mon 19 August 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
I can't enjoy MCC's The Calling or the Kinks' Arthur as much as I'd like for that very reason - atrocious sound quality. I really like Mary Chapin Carpenter (doesn't every sane music lover?) and The Kinks are one of my favourite bands of all time so I'd love to find high quality versions of both these records.

I have Arthur on vinyl and CD and the distortion is evident on the same places on both - perhaps the master tape is to blame and nothing can be done. I also have the Kinks Muswell Hillbillies in the same series of re-masters as Arthur and the sound quality is superb - hence my assertion that the master tape may be where the problem lies.

I did get a compilation by Welsh rockers Man recently and I think I'll throw it away - the sound quality is just plain awful. I can barely make out one song from another and I remembered the group as being quite accomplished musicians so I don't think it was their playing that is at fault.

The Naim label and the SHM CDs are very good; Earmark vinyl is very good too. However most CDs and elpees I have exhibit high enough sound quality to let me enjoy the music.

ATB Rotf
 
Posts: 10083 | Location: Trumptonshire | Registered: Wed 22 June 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
For me there are two ways of going at this. One find new release labels that are concerned about the quality of their product and for me that is labels like BIS (classical), Hyperion (Classical), Warp (Electronic), Mute (Electronic), Soul Jazz (Underground Music), Ninja Tune etc etc.. and two if you like a album a lot, like Steve suggests, try to find the best pressing and this forum will help with that Steve Hoffman. Now also some of the re-releases labels also do a cracking job and I can recommend Speakers Corner, Classic Records, Pure Pleasure, Lillith (Vinyl Lovers), Earmark, MoFi, Universal Japan and the new Warner Brothers 180g re-issuse great music and quality so there you have it but for me its always the MUSIC FIRST.



Dean..
 
Posts: 1708 | Location: HiFi Free Zone | Registered: Sat 18 December 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
this is my specialist subject.

Obviously a CD is only as good as the music.

BUT some labels like DCC, Audio Fidelity, Mobile Fidelity, RYKO AU20 and CBS Mastersound actually sought out the original master tapes, often mis labelled and often never used before.

Ignore the 24k gold thing, it's the mastering that counts. Most of them are worth getting but if you want to know on a CD by CD basis do a search on Stevehoffman.tv.

Basically an audiophile CD is one that uses the best tapes available, adds little or no EQ tweaks and definately no compression or noise reduction.
 
Posts: 43 | Location: London | Registered: Fri 06 June 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
555
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
There are plenty of CDs that are not marketed/labelled as 'audiophile',
but deserve a medal for sonic integrity.
For example Barry Diament's remasters of Bob Marley & the Wailers on Tuff Gong.
The original release of Dexy's Midnight Runners 'Searching for the Young Soul Rebels'.

Some more recent examples ...
Adrian Sherwood 'Becoming a Cliché'
Sigur Rós 'með suð í eyrum við spilum endalaust' (with a buzz in our ears we play endlessly)

Have you seen the SHM CD Verdict thread Jon?
 
Posts: 2595 | Location: Nemo me impune lacessit | Registered: Sat 07 July 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
....For Me Lindsay Buckingham's "Out Of The Cradle" This 1992 solo album sounds astonishingly good ...especially if you love guitar music.
 
Posts: 385 | Registered: Sat 08 April 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Manni:
Hi Fred,

you wrote:

quote:
Bad sound can't lessen the musical quality of good music, but it might lessen the quality of one's listening pleasure.


That is exactly the point. It is impossible for me to enjoy music that is hidden behind a wall of distortion and hiss.


Perfectly understandable, Manfred.

I've always considered myself very lucky that good music always gets through to me no matter the sonic fidelity. Of course I prefer the best possible, but my ears are fortunately forgiving.

All best,
Fred


 
Posts: 1760 | Location: Anytown, USA | Registered: Sat 12 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
ROTF,

I love MCC's music and have all her albums since "Come On, Come on".

They are all well recorded, The Calling no less than the others.

If your copy is bad, it's a bad copy
 
Posts: 439 | Location: Jakarta, Indonesia (and far from convinced) | Registered: Wed 09 August 2000Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Colin Lorenson:
ROTF,

I love MCC's music and have all her albums since "Come On, Come on".

They are all well recorded, The Calling no less than the others.

If your copy is bad, it's a bad copy


Hi Colin,

This caught my eye. Where is your copy of "The Calling" made?

Because I agree with ROTF. Mine is a shocker, loud and compressed. Typical modern 'car-friendly' type of CD. Impressive on modest kit like iPods but lacking full range - the levels are all pushed up.

Steve
 
Posts: 3275 | Location: Weald | Registered: Sat 05 November 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post
Since the obvious labels (MFSL, DCC, etc.) have already been mentioned, pls find below 3 of my favorites (all female vocals).
If you are into Jazz, you should have a look at the ECM label - have yet to find one that I would not consider 'audiophile'.

Cheers ... Oliver





 
Posts: 3056 | Location: Sydney / Miami | Registered: Sun 27 January 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I've found a good way of getting higher quality recordings is to look at the UK Hi-Fi press. They generally give a verdict on the quality of both music and sound quality.

I pick the CDs they ID as good sound quality and then listen to the music on itunes or youtube. Then I buy the ones I think I would like. It's a great way of finding new music.

Examples are:
Rage Against the Machine
Stanley Clarke - The Toys of Men
Elbow - The Seldom Seen Kid
Rickie Lee Jones
Kings of Leon - Because of the Times
Jack Savoretti - Between the Minds (get the special 2 CD Deluxe Edition)
Eric Bibb - Diamond Days
All Blue Nile albums are well produced and recorded
Lindsey Buckingham - Under The Skin
Dashboard Confessional - Dusk & Summer
Richard Hawley - Coles Corner
Steve Earle - Copperhead Road
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss - Raising Sand

You might like some of those.

Regards,

Huw
 
Posts: 100 | Location: Southampton | Registered: Sat 18 August 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior Member
Posted Hide Post




John.
 
Posts: 5062 | Location: Norwich, Norfolk UK | Registered: Tue 11 December 2001Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3  

Closed Topic Closed

Naim Audio Main Website    forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Naim Users  Hop To Forums  Music Room    Audiophile CDs

© Naim Audio Ltd, 2006.